Legal Opinion

Winters v. Means

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1897No. 6411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Rehearing of case reported in 48 Neb., 333.

1Opinion of the Court

Ryan, C.

In this case there was filed an opinion directing the affirmance of the judgment of the district court of Adams county. The evidence was not examined on that occasion, for the reason that it was not embodied in an authenticated bill of exceptions. (Winters v. Means, 48 Neb., 333.) Subsequently a satisfactory showing was made that before the cause was submitted there had been attached to the alleged bill of exceptions such authentication as entitled it to be considered, but that in some unaccountable manner this evidence had become detached. This, as secondary evidence, was deemed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scroggin v. National Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Taylor v. CourtnayNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Warren v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Atchison & Nebraska Railroad v. MillerNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Winters v. MeansNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wyuta Cattle Co. v. ConnellWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Syndicate Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Philipsky v. Scheflow & MonahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Martin v. New York Life Ins. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Phoenix Ins. v. T. & W. R.Ohio Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API