Legal Opinion

Scroggin v. National Lumber Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894No. 4742PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from the district court of Nuckolls county. Tried below before Morris, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Irvine, C.

None of the errors alleged to have occurred on the trial of this case can be considered, for the reason that the case is brought here by petition in error and there was no motion for a new trial in the district court. (Cropsey v. Wiggenhorn, 8 Neb., 108; Wells v. Preston, 3 Neb., 444; Singleton v. Boyle, 4 Neb., 414; Hull v. Miller, 6 Neb., 128; Crutts v. Wray, 19 Neb., 581; Manning v. Cunningham, 21 Neb., 288; Smith v. Spaulding, 34 Neb., 128; Miller v. Antelope County, 35 Neb., 237.) This rule applies as well to equity cases brought here on error as to cases at law. (Harrington v.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carlow v. C. Aultman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fitzgerald v. BrandtNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Peters v. DunnellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Taylor v. CourtnayNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Barnes v. McMurtryNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Satterlund v. BealNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 32 v. Continental Western Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Southard v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  5. Hadley v. CoreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API