State v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, J.
The respondent was convicted of tapping the electric line of the Twin State Gas & Electric Company, so that electric current could be taken therefrom, and using the current thus taken without the company’s consent. After verdict he moved in arrest of judgment and to set aside the verdict. Both motions were overruled, and the case is here on his exceptions.
The first ground for the motion in arrest was that the complaint was too uncertain to support a judgment because it might apply to either of two distinct offenses, each carrying its own penalty. The complaint charged that the respondent, at…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wellman, Admr. v. WalesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Spaulding v. Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- French v. WheldonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Shields v. Vermont Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
- Paska v. SaundersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RoundsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
- State v. BishopSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- State v. GirouardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
- State v. CioccaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Belock v. State Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.