Legal Opinion

Stamadianos v. Stamadianos

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1986No. Docket 74171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

This matter is before this Court to *3decide a question certified by the Court of Appeals1 as to whether the panel in the instant case erred in holding that the ten-day county residency rule set forth in MCL 552.9; MSA 25.89 is a venue provision rather than a jurisdictional provision.

Also before this Court is the issue raised by the plaintiff (treated as an application for leave to appeal)2 regarding attorney fees, assessments, and costs.

We reverse the Court of Appeals decision in Stamadianos v Stamadianos, 133 Mich App 430; 350 NW2d 268 (1984), and hold that the ten-day county residency…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Fox v. Board of Regents of University of Mich.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Haines v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Yedinak v. YedinakMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kar v. NandaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Lewis v. LewisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Estes v. TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Jan Kay Estes v. Jeff Edward TitusMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API