Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Beaver County Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1924No. 3459PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IVERSON, District Judge.

This appeal involves a general adjudication of water rights on that segment of the Beaver river extending from the lower end of what is commonly known as the “Beaver Valley” to a point approximately 14 miles below the town of Milford. The testimony is very voluminous, but for the purpose of this opinion it will suffice to make a statement of the following facts, which are established by the record:

From the Beaver Valley the river flows through a canyon approximately 7 miles in length from the lower end of which it traverses a tract of land owned by the appellant,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. Watson Slough Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  4. Gardner v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Walsh v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Department of Ecology v. GrimesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. United States v. Ahtanum Irrigation District, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. Garrison, State Engineer v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Weber Basin Water Conservancy District v. GaileyUtah Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API