Legal Opinion

Taborn v. Hammonds

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 27, 1989No. 487A88PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether the Durham City Board of Education (hereinafter “the Board”) was justified in reducing the number of teaching positions for its Exceptional Children Program, when the Durham City Schools had lost a substantial portion of the state and federal funds for that program. We conclude that the Board’s findings and conclusions resulting in the adoption of its superintendent’s recommendation to terminate teaching positions were supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record submitted. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. Seattle School District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Taylor v. CrispSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Overton v. Goldsboro City Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Cal. Sch. Emps. Ass'n v. Pasadena Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Farris v. Burke County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. N.C. Ass'n of Educators, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Babb v. Independent School District No. I-5 of Rogers CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Huntsville City Board of Education v. FrasierCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. In re the Non-Reemployment of Isch v. Oklahoma Independent School District No. I-89Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API