Legal Opinion
Gary Reece v. Bank of New York Mellon
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 23, 2014No. 12-3526, 13-1245PublishedCited by 147 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
After Gary Reece received a non judicial foreclosure notice, he obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO) against Bank of New York, Mellon (Mellon) in Arkansas state court. Over a year later, he amended his TRO complaint, seeking to represent a class of Arkansas homeowners facing non judicial foreclosures by Mellon. Mellon filed a notice of removal in federal court within thirty days of the amended complaint’s filing. Reece moved to remand. The district court denied Reece’s motion to remand and then granted Mel-Ion’s motion to dismiss. After Reece timely appealed those…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Hargett v. Revclaims, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Aguayo v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- De La Rosa v. Reliable, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Nuevos Destinos, LLC v. Samuel PeckCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- McDaniel v. LoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.