Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Carroll
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided October 5, 1970No. C-96-D-69PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDWIN M. STANLEY, Chief Judge.
The defendants, John Carroll and A. Epstein Company, have moved, pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for an order dismissing this action, or in lieu thereof an order quashing the return of service of summons, on the ground that neither defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court. The plaintiff, Hilda W. Robinson, has moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), for an order transferring the action from this Court to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. For the reasons…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marve A. Dubin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. BerkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Mayo Clinic, Edward S. Judd and D. O. Ferris v. Edward KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Internatio-Rotterdam, Inc. v. ThomsenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hobert M. O'Neal v. Hicks Brokerage Company and George B. Wolfe, Inc., of Which Hicks Brokerage Company IsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Mulcahy v. GuertlerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Jenkins v. Albuquerque Lonestar Freightliner, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Porter v. GroatDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1989
- Miles v. Charles E. Smith CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975