Legal Opinion

Kadow v. Aluminum Specialty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1948PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. *

The question presented for decision is whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the finding of the trial court that there was a mutual mistake of fact as to what land plaintiffs were selling and defendant was buying.

Plaintiffs and defendant owned adjoining platted lands in the industrial area of the city of Manitowoc. Plaintiffs’ property had been a woodworking plant and had been dismantled and idle for several years. There were buildings on it, including a heating plant; barracks, and warehouse on the east portion thereof. During the early part of 1941 plaintiffs sold and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Miller v. StanichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Sable v. MaloheyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Kruse v. KoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Jentzsch v. RoenfanzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ahnapee & Western Railway Co. v. ChallonerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Jeske v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Carney-Rutter Agency, Inc. v. Central Office Buildings, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Hajec v. NovitzkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Chandelle Enterprises, LLC v. XLNT Dairy Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API