Legal Opinion

Jentzsch v. Roenfanz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

If the trial court is right in finding that there was a mutual mistake of the parties in the deed executed by the plaintiff to Henry J. Peters on November 17, 1903, it is quite clear that there was no such laches on the part of the plaintiff as would bar her right to relief in this action. It is not denied that she has been in the actual possession of the disputed land ever since the erection of the disputed fence, following the family difficulty in 1905.

The determination of this case must rest upon the question of whether or not there was a mutual mistake. A mistake, in order to be mutual,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Botsford v. McLeanNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Grant Marble Co. v. AbbotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. StanichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Carney-Rutter Agency, Inc. v. Central Office Buildings, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Howard v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Kadow v. Aluminum Specialty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Chandelle Enterprises, LLC v. XLNT Dairy Farm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API