Legal Opinion

Juan Valenzuela v. L. Small

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2017No. 15-56971UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

To justify equitable tolling, Valenzuela must show that he diligently pursued his rights and that an extraordinary circumstance “stood in his way” and prevented timely filing. Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631, 649, 130 S.Ct. 2549, 177 L.Ed.2d 130 (2010), “[Sjerious instances of attorney misconduct” can create an extraordinary circumstance sufficient to justify equitable tolling. Id. at 652, 130 S.Ct. 2549; Doe v. Busby, 661 F.3d 1001, 1012-14 (9th Cir. 2011). We apply this standard leniently when a prisoner proceeds pro se. Fue v. Biter, 842 F.3d 650, 657 (9th Cir. 2016) (en…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doe v. BusbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Steven Fue v. Martin BiterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry v. Washington State Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
  2. Tomaszycki v. MiniardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API