Legal Opinion
Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Sun-Times, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 31, 1988No. 88-1392PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 (the “Union”) commenced this action to compel the defendant-appel-lee, Chicago Sun-Times, Inc. (the “Sun-Times”), to arbitrate a dispute over the proper interpretation of a collective bargaining agreement. 1 The district court found that the parties were not in “controversy [or] ... disagreement as to interpretation or enforcement of the terms of th[e] Agreement” as required by the contract’s arbitration clause. The court refused to order arbitration of what it considered a non-existent dispute. It therefore…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Zurich American Insurance Company v. Watts IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Chicago Typographical Union No. 16 v. Chicago Sun-Times, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Local 1814, International Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Progressive Lodge No. 1000 v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Aluminum Brick and Glass Workers International Union v. Aaa Plumbing Pottery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.