Legal Opinion

prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,867 Hydro-Air Equipment, Inc. v. Hyatt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1988No. 86-2774PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Hydro-Air Equipment, Inc. appeals the Nevada district court’s summary judgment in favor of Hyatt Corporation. Hydro-Air sought a declaratory judgment from the district court, contending that it was entitled to indemnification from Hyatt for settlement costs it paid in the “Ampico action,” a lawsuit that followed the 1980 MGM Grand Hotel fire in Las Vegas. The district court held that Hydro-Air’s request for implied equitable indemnity could not be maintained as a matter of law because Hydro-Air did not stand in the relationship of joint tortfeasor with Hyatt. We reverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Jeppesen & Company, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jeppesen & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
  5. Aetna Life and Casualty Co. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Winter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  4. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API