prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,867 Hydro-Air Equipment, Inc. v. Hyatt Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Hydro-Air Equipment, Inc. appeals the Nevada district court’s summary judgment in favor of Hyatt Corporation. Hydro-Air sought a declaratory judgment from the district court, contending that it was entitled to indemnification from Hyatt for settlement costs it paid in the “Ampico action,” a lawsuit that followed the 1980 MGM Grand Hotel fire in Las Vegas. The district court held that Hydro-Air’s request for implied equitable indemnity could not be maintained as a matter of law because Hydro-Air did not stand in the relationship of joint tortfeasor with Hyatt. We reverse…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
- Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut Corporation v. Jeppesen & Company, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Jeppesen & Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1977
- Aetna Life and Casualty Co. v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Winter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Center Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.