Cooney v. Greenwalt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
Plaintiffs, surviving sisters of Harry Greenwalt, the insured herein, brought this action to have an annuity policy upon the life of the insured reformed by having themselves adjudicated as entitled to the proceeds of the policy on the ground that the insured, prior to his death, had by written assignment effected a change of beneficiary, or'had thereby made a gift of the proceeds, in their favor to the exclusion of his widow, who is the actual beneficiary designated in the policy.
Upon the commencement of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Edelstein v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Boehne v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Schoenau v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kath v. KathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. BellandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Joint Revocable Trust Agreement of John N. Charais and ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024