Landahl v. Chrysler Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs and defendant’s motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for personal injuries sustained in an accident caused by an alleged defect in the steering mechanism of an automobile *927purchased from defendant Case. Defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs had failed to establish a defect in the steering mechanism. Defendant’s motion should not have been granted. A plaintiff in a products liability action need not establish the precise nature of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Narciso v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anderson v. Chrysler Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- Brown v. BorrusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Fili v. Matson Motors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Schnorr v. Emeritus Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- George Larkin Trucking Co. v. Lisbon Tire Mart, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.