Legal Opinion
George Larkin Trucking Co. v. Lisbon Tire Mart, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 23, 1994PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Alleging causes of action sounding in negligence, strict products liability, and breach of warranty, plaintiffs instituted this action seeking recovery for truck engine damage and consequential business interruption losses allegedly caused by defendant’s sale of a defective 55-gallon drum of motor oil. Defendant appeals from a judgment, entered following a jury trial on the issue of liability only, that determined defendant to be 100% liable on all three theories. Defendant contends that the proof was insufficient to establish that the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rosado v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mahiques v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Taft v. Sports Page Shop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Triple R Farm Partnership v. Iba, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- MAHIQUES, FRANK J. v. COUNTY OF NIAGARA FALLSAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Mahiques v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016