Legal Opinion

Donoho v. Hunter

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1926No. Motion No. 6962—3869PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

The nature and result of this case have been fully stated in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals. See 242 S.W. 282. Briefly speaking, this was a suit by defendants in error to cancel a deed because of fraud perpetrated by plaintiffs in error. The district court did rescind the trade and permit the grantees in the deed to recover their purchase money. That judg-' ment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, and reported as aforesaid.

Writ of error was granted by the Supreme Court, and the cause referred to us. Upon our recommendation, the judgments of the district court and Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Associated Oil Co. v. HartTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Waggoner v. ZundelowitzTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  3. Greene v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Donoho v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Donoho v. HunterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caprito v. Grisham-Hunter CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Clem v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Allen v. LasseterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Owen v. Al Parker Securities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Holt v. ManleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API