Legal Opinion

Donoho v. Hunter

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1925No. 433-3869PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, P. J.

This case has given us much difficulty, not because the questions presented are so intricate, but because of the number of assignments in the application. It contains 80 typewritten pages, with 53 assignments of error. If we should treat each assignment, it would necessarily make our opinion unbearably long. We have carefully gone through the application, considering each assignment upon its own merits. Having done so, we have concluded that the trial court entered the correct judgment, and that the Court of Civil Appeals did not err in affirming it. See 242 S. W. 282.

The opinion of the Court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Labbe v. CorbettTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Mead v. . BunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
  3. Fisher v. MellenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Macey v. TitcombeIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Risch v. Von LillienthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Donoho v. HunterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Territo v. HarkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API