Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Seymour v. Canal Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari to the canal hoard. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is a common-law certiorari to review the proceedings of the canal board in regard to an award of canal damages to the relator.

The relator claimed to be the owner of a farm in the town of Vestal, in the county of Broome, through which the Chenango canal extension is constructed. For the damage caused him. thereby he filed a claim in the office of the canal appraisers, amounting, in the aggregate, to $4,772.50. The appraisers made an award, giving the relator damages to the amount of $4,046.43.

The canal commissioner in charge appealed to the canal board from the decision of the appraisers,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Le Roy v. Mayor of New-YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  2. People v. Three of the Judges of Suffolk CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1840

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Bushnell v. NewellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. MacfarlaneHawaii Supreme Court · 1902
  3. People ex rel. Kilmer v. CheritreeNew York Supreme Court · 1874
  4. People ex rel. Peck v. Canal BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  5. People ex rel. Press Publishing Co. v. MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API