Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. Macfarlane

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeals from Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PREAR, C.J.

These applications for writs of mandamus to compel the Commissioners of Fire Claims to amend their awards in certain cases, were heard together both in the lower court and in this court on appeal.

Much property having been destroyed in the city of Honolulu during December, 1899, and January, 1900, under or in consequence of orders of the Board of Health in suppressing bubonic plague, provision was made by Act 15 of the Laws of *4831901 for the appointment of a Commission to bear and determine claims for damages for such loss of property and for tbe payment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  3. In Re RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. People Ex Rel. S. U.H.R.R. Co. v. . BettsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Territory of Hawaii v. MiguelHawaii Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. ShintakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. AmesHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In re Royal InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  5. In re ColburnHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API