Legal Opinion
Barnes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 12, 2000No. 97-CF-2000, 98-CO-390, 99-CO-641PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FARRELL, Associate Judge:
Found guilty by a jury of possession with intent to distribute cocaine (PWID) and unlawful possession of ammunition, and by the court of unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, Barnes challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his PWID conviction and contends that the trial court erroneously denied his post-trial motion under D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996) alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.
I
A
Executing a warrant based partly on information obtained from a confidential informant, police entered a rowhouse at 1335 5th Street, N.W., in which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Edelen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Doret v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- DEANDRE BROOKS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Gamble v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- TRAVIS MCRAE v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016