Legal Opinion

Edelen v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1993No. 91-CF-1308PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

Carroll Edelen was convicted by a jury of second degree murder while armed 1 and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. 2 On appeal, he presents three principal issues for our consideration. First, Edelen contends that he is entitled to a new trial under the doctrine of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), because the prosecution provided him with requested exculpatory materials too late for their effective use at trial, and because the trial judge refused to take remedial action to protect Edelen’s rights. Second, Edelen…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Ebron v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. MacKabee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Perez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API