Legal Opinion

State v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 4, 1984No. C9-83-1758PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

Appellant, Wilfred J. Hines, was convicted of simple robbery, burglary, theft, and two counts of receiving stolen property. Appellant asserts that the admission of State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 139 N.W.2d 167 (1965) evidence was reversible error, that the evidence was not sufficient to establish his guilt, and that he was improperly convicted of theft and receiving stolen property where he was also convicted of robbery. We affirm the robbery and burglary and receiving (transferring) stolen property convictions, and vacate the theft and receiving (possessing) stolen…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. NashCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. State v. StaniferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API