Legal Opinion

State v. Nash

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 11, 1984No. C4-83-1151PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery under Minn.Stat. § 609.-245 following a jury trial before Hennepin County District Court. Defendant claims (1) that the evidence was insufficient to justify the conviction because the alleged victim’s wallet was never recovered; (2) that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser offenses of attempted aggravated robbery, simple robbery and attempted simple robbery; and (3) that the trial judge should have departed downward in durational sentencing, from the presumptive sentence, because the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  4. State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ThurmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. StephaniCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Loftus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API