Legal Opinion

United States v. Espinoza-Flores

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 28, 2018No. 17-1264Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Robert E. Bacharach, Circuit Judge

This appeal is brought by Mr. Jose Daniel Espinoza-Flores, who was convicted of illegal reentry after conviction of an aggravated felony and sentenced to 36 months’ imprisonment. Mr. Espinoza-Flores appeals, arguing that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. We disagree.

I. We apply the abuse-of-discretion standard.

We review the substantive reasonableness of Mr. Espinoza-Flores’s sentence under the abuse-of-discretion standard. United States v. Steele, 603 F.3d 803, 809 (10th Cir. 2010). “[A]s long as the balance struck by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. SmartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. ConlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Martinez-BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. SellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API