Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 6, 2006No. 3:04cv1430 (JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [DOC. #65]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Defendants Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“Metro-North”), Metro-North Director of Power Systems James Gillies, and Metro-North Overhead Line Department General Supervisor Joseph Cleary move for reconsideration of the Court’s Ruling on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (“Summary Judgment Ruling”) [Doe. # 28], which granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion, maintaining plaintiffs discrimination and retaliation claims brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bruce C. Shrader v. Csx Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Christopher Graham v. Long Island Rail RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Patricia SHUMWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKinney v. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- White v. State of Connecticut Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Michel v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020
- Perkins v. Greater Bridgeport Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023