Legal Opinion

Broadstreet v. McKamey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1908No. 6,251PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Prom Putnam Circuit Court; P. O. Colliver, Judge. Action by Andrew V. McKamey against J ames A. Broad-street and another. Prom a judgment against Broadstreet, he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRoby, C. J.

Action on a promissory note by appellee against appellant, James A. Broadstreet, surety, and William Broadstreet, principal. The appellant filed an answer of non est factum, and also a cross-complaint against the appellee and his codefendant, admitting the execution of the note and the signing of his name thereto by William Broad-street, but averring that said William was without authority so to do, that he received no consideration, and that the signing of his name was a forgery. The issues were closed by general denials.

1. The cause was tried by a jury, which returned a verdict for appellee…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hynds v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Columbus, Chicago, & Indiana Central Railway Co. v. PowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AdamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Barnett v. GlutingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Sage v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roper v. Cannel City Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Wagner v. McCoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Ross v. Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  4. Tax Commission v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API