Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Air Methods, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 25, 1995No. 4-92-1263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RICHARD MILLS, District Judge *:

A “whistleblower” ease.

After nine days of trial by jury, and at the close of Plaintiffs ease, judgment must be entered for Defendant as a matter of law.

Facts

Air Methods provides helicopter air ambulance services to a consortium of hospitals in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area and Greyson Morrow was employed as a helicopter pilot. Morrow was apparently an intelligent, able and competent helicopter pilot. He was a 1974 graduate of the United States Air Force Academy and served six years on active duty as a commissioned officer. He then worked as a civilian…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Feges v. Perkins Restaurants, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. Herbert F. CAUDILL, Appellant, v. FARMLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  4. Billy R. Johnson and Beverly A. Johnson v. Cowell Steel Structures, Inc., F/k/a B.C. Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  5. Michaelson v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erik Gundacker v. Unisys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  2. Erik Gundacker v. Unisys CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API