Legal Opinion

Eckert v. VanPelt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1904No. 13,641PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Cowley district court; James Lawrence, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J. :

On May 23, 1902, plaintiff in error, T. W. Eckert, who was the editor of the Arkansas City Daily Traveler, printed and published in his newspaper the following :

“It is reported that Charlie Mclntire may soon take charge of Greer’s supplement in this city. Charlie is all right. In fact, anybody would be an improvement on the eunuch who is snorting, around in the basement, but unable to do anything else.”

Soon after this publication defendant in error, W. W. VanPelt, began an action for damages sustained by reason of the alleged libel. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harris v. ZanoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. De Witt v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Culmer v. CanbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Hetherington v. SterrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  5. Allen v. News Publishing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gobin v. Globe Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  2. Burton v. Crowell Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  3. Dusabek v. MartzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Nolan v. Standard Publishing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sheibley v. HuseNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API