Legal Opinion

Hetherington v. Sterry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1882PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from .Lyon District Court. Action brought by Sterry against Hetherington, to recover damages for an alleged libel. At the September Term, 1881, of the district court, defendant’s demurrer to the petition was overruled. This ruling Hetherington brings here. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action of libel. A demurrer to the petition was overruled, and the defendant, as plaintiff in error, now brings the question of the sufficiency of the petition to this court for review. The publication is charged to have been false and malicious, and the single question is, whether the articles complained of are, in view of all the facts disclosed in the petition, libelous. The following is a copy of the articles:

“He [Sterry] advised the [city] council that it had the right to sink a well on the banks of the Cottonwood river,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. SodenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Toepke v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Russell v. AnthonySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tidmore v. MillsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Jerald v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Talbot v. MackNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Eckert v. VanPeltSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Jerald v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API