Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 13, 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKUSICK, Chief Justice.

Petitioner Robert Smith appeals the Superior Court’s summary dismissal of his pro se petition for post-conviction review. Because we agree with his appellate counsel’s contentions that his petition did not merit dismissal under the standard provided by M.R.Crim.P. 70(b), 1 we vacate the dismissal and remand the proceeding so that Smith may have the opportunity to amend his petition with the help of counsel.

On October 20, 1982, Smith plead guilty to a two-count indictment charging him with burglary, Class B, 17-A M.R.S.A. § 401 (1983), and theft, Class E, 17-A M.R. S.A.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BlanchardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  4. State v. AllisonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  5. State v. PalmerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Landry v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. State v. BrooksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Libby v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. Cravalho v. MaineDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API