State v. Jordan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. ORS 138.060(3). The ground for the suppression was that the judge who issued the warrant did not comply with the statutory requirements for issuing a telephonic warrant. We disagree and reverse and remand.
Prineville Officer Long called the District Court judge in Madras on the morning of October 7, 1983, and requested a warrant to search an apartment in Prineville. He told the judge that the occupant was preparing to move out that afternoon. Long then turned on a tape recorder in his office, the judge…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. Martin/DillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. LovellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989