Legal Opinion

State v. Jordan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 1985No. 13897; CA A31231PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

The state appeals a pretrial order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. ORS 138.060(3). The ground for the suppression was that the judge who issued the warrant did not comply with the statutory requirements for issuing a telephonic warrant. We disagree and reverse and remand.

Prineville Officer Long called the District Court judge in Madras on the morning of October 7, 1983, and requested a warrant to search an apartment in Prineville. He told the judge that the occupant was preparing to move out that afternoon. Long then turned on a tape recorder in his office, the judge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. Martin/DillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. State v. LovellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API