Legal Opinion

State v. Lovell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1989No. 88-04-1312; CA A50943Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction for theft in the first degree. ORS 164.055. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, because a deputy sheriff entered into his corral, seized a calf and then administered a “mothering test” without a search warrant and in the absence of exigent circumstances. We affirm.

On March 7, 1988, a calf was born on a ranch owned by Harris. Two days later, Harris noticed that the calf was gone. As a result of a conversation with a neighboring rancher, Harris went to defendant’s ranch to investigate. While Harris was driving to the ranch,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. DixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. MilliganOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API