Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Lustik

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to compel the specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real property.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

The complaint sets forth a contract for the conveyance of certain lands, partial performance upon the part of plaintiff, and the failure of defendant upon demand, to fulfill; and in the prayer for relief demands judgment for specific performance or, in the alternative, for money damages.

The answer is a general denial. Upon the trial the evidence presented by"plaintiff tended to show a verbal contract *104between the parties; that plaintiff made a down payment of $600 on the purchase price, and that with the making of the contract he was placed by defendant in possession of the property. That of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bradley v. . AldrichNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  3. Barlow v. . ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. McKinley v. . HessenNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Freedman v. . OppenheimNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Columbia River Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McDonald v. SkinnerNew York Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API