Legal Opinion
United States v. James T. Tabacca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 29, 1991No. 88-5434PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAMUEL P. KING, District Judge:
Tabacca was convicted for interfering with a flight attendant under 49 U.S.C.App. § 1472®.
Tabacca asserts the District Court erred both in denying his Motions for Judgment of Acquittal and in refusing to give a requested jury instruction. Tabacca also argues that 49 U.S.C.App. § 1472(j) is unconstitutionally vague. Finally, Tabacca asserts the District Court abused its discretion by dismissing an absent juror after the commencement of deliberations.
The decisions of the District Court as to the Motions for Judgment of Acquittal and the requested jury instruction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Weinberger v. RossiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Rhode Island v. Narragansett Indian TribeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- United States v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lewis M. Dischner, United States of America v. Carl W. MathisenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Paul Kent CasselCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Ronald Olen BurrowsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.