Legal Opinion

King v. City of Birmingham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1932No. 6 Div. 94PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is an action for damages instituted by appellant for injuries received in falling on a sidewalk of the city of Birmingham, in the nighttime, cause by a water pipe extending across said sidewalk. The pipe supplied water to the property of defendant Henderson from the “main” of the Birmingham Water Works Company in and under the adjacent street; said defendant owned the property adjoining said street and sidewalk over which said pipe extended.

The trial was had upon counts 1 and 4 of the complaint, as amended.

Count 4 alleged, in substance, that the injuries of the plaintiff were caused and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  2. City of Birmingham v. MauzeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Bland v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  4. McDougall v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. City of Birmingham v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  2. Robins v. GarvineSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  3. Maise v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API