Legal Opinion
Hoover v. Gershman Investment Corp.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 17, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-10851-SPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS
SKINNER, District Judge.
Background
This case arises out of a series of disputes surrounding a foreclosure by defendant Gershman Investment Corp. (Gershman) on a Missouri residence then owned by pro se plaintiff Benjamin Hoover, Jr., in joint tenancy with his parents Benjamin Hoover, Sr., (Hoover, Sr.) and Gloria Hoover, who are both residents of Missouri. Defendant is an Arkansas corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri. Plaintiff claims to be a Massachusetts citizen attending law school…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Anthony F. McDonald v. Frank A. HallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- David R. Ferranti v. John J. MoranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Addison v. North Carolina Department of Crime & Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Schramek v. JonesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Orden v. Cornell UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- Addison v. NC DEPT. OF CRIMEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Americredit Financial Services Inc. v. PinnexDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.