Legal Opinion
Schramek v. Jones
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided April 12, 1995No. 94-868-CIV-T-17PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RULE 11 SANCTIONS
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before this Court on Defendant’s motion to impose sanctions on pro se Plaintiffs, pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P. (Docket No 36). Plaintiffs have not timely filed a memorandum in response. The Plaintiffs have, however, filed a notice of appeal of the Court’s order of February 21, 1995, which granted the Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
In the Eleventh Circuit, three (3) types of conduct warrant Rule 11 sanctions: when a party files a pleading that has no reasonable factual basis; when a party files a pleading…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robert H. Ketchum v. Salvador Cruz, M.D., Spanish Peaks Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Edward Orlett v. Cincinnati Microwave, Inc., James L. JaegerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Roberto Navarro-Ayala v. Jose A. NunezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Reinhold Didie, Hakan Bennhagen v. Ashley Howes, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Burnette v. GodshallDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rickmyer v. BrowneDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Montgomery & Larmoyeux v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
- Mills v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2005
- Starceski v. United Van Lines LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023