Legal Opinion
State v. Bale
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1978No. 47909PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
This is an appeal by the state pursuant to Rule 29.03, Rules of Criminal Procedure, from that part of a pretrial order of the trial court suppressing physical evidence in a prosecution of defendant for aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, subd. 2. In reversing the order of suppression and remanding for trial, we need not decide whether the initial warrantless custodial arrest of defendant for a misdemeanor offense of driving after revocation of a driver’s license was valid. The state is not precluded from prosecuting defendant for an alleged aggravated assault with a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. PluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- State v. WeekesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. Steven Curtis WaupekenayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. BrocuglioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. SeefeldtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. SickelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. HardySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.