Legal Opinion
Aultman, Miller & Co. v. Clifford
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 27, 1893No. 8399PublishedCited by 9 opinions
Appeal by defendant, Michael Clifford, from an order of the District Court of Traverse County, C. L. Brown, J., made July 30,1892, granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial after verdict for defendant. The plaintiff is a corporation.
1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.
The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant in the district court for the sum of $110, upon the instrument, of which the following is a copy viz.:
“July 13th, 1891. ‘I have this day ordered of Aultman, Miller & Co. one seven-foot Buckeye binder, for which I agree to pay one [hundred and forty dollars, — note for one hundred and ten dollars, [and his old McCormick binder; three fall payments, at'eight'per [cent. The binder to be delivered on or before July 25th, 1891.’ ”
I Before the last-named dáte the parties substituted a six-foot [binder, with bundle carrier, in the place of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thompson v. LibbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Kessler v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- O'Donnell v. LeemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1857
3Cited by9 opinions
- Potter v. EastonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- W. W. Kimball Co. v. MasseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Heskett v. Border Queen Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.