Legal Opinion

Aetna Insurance Company v. Eisenberg

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1960No. LR 3626PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment (28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 (1958)) upon a policy of inland marine fire insurance. Plaintiff, Aetna Insurance Company, seeks to have the policy, a Furriers’ Customers Basic Policy issued to defendant, Saul Eisenberg, doing business as Saul Eisenberg, Exclusive Furrier, in Little Rock, Arkansas, declared void because of defendant’s alleged fraud and violation of a policy promissory warranty in making false monthly reports of storage values. Customers of Eisenberg’s having claims under this policy have been allowed to intervene to prevent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Millers National Insurance v. BundsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  3. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Commodity Credit Corp. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance Company v. Saul EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Aetna Insurance v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API