Aetna Insurance Company v. Eisenberg
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory judgment (28 U.S.C.A. § 2201 (1958)) upon a policy of inland marine fire insurance. Plaintiff, Aetna Insurance Company, seeks to have the policy, a Furriers’ Customers Basic Policy issued to defendant, Saul Eisenberg, doing business as Saul Eisenberg, Exclusive Furrier, in Little Rock, Arkansas, declared void because of defendant’s alleged fraud and violation of a policy promissory warranty in making false monthly reports of storage values. Customers of Eisenberg’s having claims under this policy have been allowed to intervene to prevent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- Millers National Insurance v. BundsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
- Commodity Credit Corp. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aetna Insurance Company v. Saul EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
- Aetna Insurance v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961