Legal Opinion
Glens Falls Insurance v. Rich
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 26, 1975No. Civ. 33973PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOLINARI, P. J.
In this declaratory relief action brought by Glens .Falls Insurance Company (“Glens Falls”) against- Harry E. DuBay (“DuBay”), its insured under a homeowner’s insurance policy, and Elton Michael Rich (“Rich”), who was injured while riding as a passenger in DuBay’s automobile as the result of the discharge of DuBay’s shotgun, the question is whether the trial court erred in denying recovery to Rich under said policy on the ground that the accident arose out of the use of the automobile so as to cause it to come within the automobile exclusionary provision of said policy.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PartridgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Herzog v. National American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Azar v. Employers Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Bareno v. Employers Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Capital Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Lawver v. BolingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Safeco Insurance v. GilstrapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.