Jankey v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CONVERTED TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIMS
BAIRD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Defendant’s motion to dismiss, converted by this Court into a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether Twentieth Century Fox film studio is a “public accommodation” covered by the ADA, came on regularly for hearing on August 3, 1998. Having carefully considered the papers submitted and oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS summary judgment in favor of defendant. As the only…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Carparts Distribution Center, Inc. v. Automotive Wholesaler's Association of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Independent Living Resources v. Oregon Arena Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Parr v. L & L Drive-Inn RestaurantDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2000
- Chris Langer v. Milan KiserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Nolan v. Starlight Pines Homeowners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Doran v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.