Legal Opinion

Hendel v. Kam Water Heater Mfg. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 6, 1953No. Civ. No. 12480PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, Chief Judge.

In this action for patent infringement and unfair competition, defendant moves for summary judgment upon the grounds of noninfringement of the patent in suit and the lack of any genuine issue of fact as to the claim of unfair competition, and for an award of reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to Title 35 U.S.C. § 70. For the purposes of this motion defendant raises no question as to the validity of the patent.

*568The patent in suit is No. 2,407,276 for “Shock Absorber for Hydraulic Systems”. As appears from paragraph 1 of plaintiff’s answers to defendant’s interrogatories, only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wagner Typewriter Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Young v. Ralston Purina Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Liberman v. RuwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolgoff v. Kaynar Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API