Commonwealth v. Rucco
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
This is an appeal from an Order denying appellant’s motion to quash an indictment based on an alleged violation of the “180 day rule.”1 We do not reach the substantive issue for it is clear that the appeal is from an interlocutory order and must be quashed.
With the exception of those classes of appeals which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme and Commonwealth Courts, this court has appellate jurisdiction over “all appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas.” Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, July 31, 1970, P. L. 673, No. 223, Art. Ill,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Valley Forge Industries, Inc. v. Armand Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. DeFeliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- McConnell v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.