Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rucco

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 434PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from an Order denying appellant’s motion to quash an indictment based on an alleged violation of the “180 day rule.”1 We do not reach the substantive issue for it is clear that the appeal is from an interlocutory order and must be quashed.

With the exception of those classes of appeals which are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Supreme and Commonwealth Courts, this court has appellate jurisdiction over “all appeals from final orders of the courts of common pleas.” Appellate Court Jurisdiction Act, July 31, 1970, P. L. 673, No. 223, Art. Ill,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Commonwealth v. KilgallenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Commonwealth v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Industries, Inc. v. Armand Construction, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. DeFeliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. McConnell v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. BennettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. BernhardtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API