Commonwealth v. Washington
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Me. Justice Eobeets,
This case presents to our Court a matter which is one of first impression—a defendant’s right to appeal from denial of his motion filed pursuant to Eule 324 of Criminal Procedure 1 to suppress a statement allegedly obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S. Ct. 1602 (1966). We hold that the decision below refusing to suppress appellant’s statement is. not at this juncture appealable and therefore this appeal must be quashed.
Appellant relies primarily upon subsection (e) of Rule 324, 2 and insists that he may appeal because the determination…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Commonwealth v. BosurgiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- McKnett v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. BoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. DeMichelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Sigma Reproductive Health Center v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Commonwealth v. GullettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.