Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 6, 2004No. 03-3575PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

In this sentencing appeal in which the district court departed downward without notifying the parties prior to the sentencing hearing and the imposition of the sentence, the question is whether Rule 32(h) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, codifying Burns v. United States, 501 U.S. 129, 111 S.Ct. 2182, 115 L.Ed.2d 123 (1991), requires that we remand the case to the district court for resentencing in light of the district court’s failure to comply with its terms. We conclude that we are required to remand to the district court for reconsideration of the downward…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Quinn Hickey, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. William Cortes-ClaudioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Jerry MuzikaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Ruth Alston BreedingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Jerry Wayne Matheny, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. James Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Raymond HunterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. TateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API