Legal Opinion
Rivkin v. Coleman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 21, 1997No. 95 Civ. 6332(RWS)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendant Sydney Reese Coleman (“Dr. Coleman”) has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss plaintiff Cheryl Obedin Rivkin’s (“Ms. Rivkin”) complaint. The original complaint sought liability on several New York State law grounds: (1) accounting; (2) breach of fiduciary duties; (3) fraud; (4) unjust enrichment; (5) tortious interference with contract; (6) discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of New York Executive Law § 296; (7) back pay; and (8) return of personal property. This Court dismissed claims one, three and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Naughright v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Geneva Pharmaceuticals Technology Corp. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Oppedisano v. ZurDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024