Legal Opinion
United States v. Steven Paul Berndt, United States of America v. David John Asmussen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1996No. 95-3503, 95-3938PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
Steven Paul Bemdt and David John Asmussen appeal various aspects of their convictions and sentencing. Asmussen contends that the evidence was insufficient to convict him, the district court 1 erred by imposing a two-level Guidelines enhancement for obstruction of justice, and that the district court miscalculated the amount of the loss to the victims for sentencing purposes. Bemdt claims the district court erred by imposing a fine and restitution against him. We affirm the convictions and sentences.
I. BACKGROUND
This ease involves a conspiracy between the defendants…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Francisco Granados, United States of America v. Mark E. MoraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Randall Rogers, United States of America v. Scott J. PhilippCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- United States v. Gary O'DellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Shaun ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. CallawayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Douglas G. Radtke, United States of America v. Scott Christopher Radtke, United States of America, Michael Thomas DonohoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Robert H. Frank, Also Known as "Butch" Frank, United States of America v. Lorin A. AhlersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.