Legal Opinion

Berthel Land & Livestock v. Rockies Express Pipeline LLC

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2012No. S-10-0227, S-10-0228PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[T1] Berthel Land and Livestock (Ber-thel) entered into a Pipeline Easement Agreement (Agreement) with Rockies Express Pipeline (Rockies Express). After completion of the pipeline, Berthel filed an action against Rockies Express asserting claims for breach of contract and fraudulent inducement. The breach of contract claims alleged a failure to remove rock from the property and a failure to provide required as-built drawings of the completed pipeline, and the fraudulent inducement claim alleged that Rockies Express never intended to remove the rock as required by the Agreement.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. MULLINNIX LLC v. HKB Royalty TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Harber v. JensenWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jason Thornock v. Pacificorp, an Oregon CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Bear Peak Resources, LLC v. Peak Powder River Resources, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  4. David A. Pope, CPA LLC and David A. Pope, Individually v. Mary C. RosenbergWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Four B Properties, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and Ranch 10, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company v. The Nature Conservancy, a District of Columbia non-profit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API